But they have a lot of other issues which makes me want to avoid them.Īffinity Photo is a good looking program with a lot of quality features but it still has some real bugs and holes in its feature set (better automation and scripting is one better automatic subject selection is another). They can also launch Photoshop plugins as part of playback. Maybe because they got them when they acquired it from JASC 20 years ago. I guess people need to resort to scripting with something like Autohotkey or Microsoft PowerAutomate, if they want it to work (not exactly my first choice).Įven sad-sack Corel (the company where formerly good programs go to fester and die a long slow death) has scripting capabilities in Paint Shop Pro. I've seen this as a long running complaint and bug report from Windows users that's never been fixed. The plugins do not show up here in Windows no matter what I do. The documentation claims you can create keyboard shortcuts for plugins under the filter shortcuts, but no. I thought I could always create extra keyboard shortcuts to do similar things in a hurry. I agree with the suggestion for more robust scripting since I'm still unable to use Affinity Photo to complete tasks I can do in other Adobe products (even PS Elements) in an expedited workflow that makes sense.Īffinity Photo will not launch external Photoshop plugins from macro playback, even if I don't care about it saving all the external plugins settings. Adobe for all its faults has these and had them 10 years ago.Īdding both an API and proper scripting would go a long way to getting some users back. The scripting's necessary because extensions are more than just making a filter - you could add extra import and export options, dialog boxes, et al. An API and proper scripting language (Python would be cool) would allow the users to extend these apps in directions that are in popular demand. 3rd Parties (so far as I know) don't design plugins for Affinity. 8bf plugins, the actual usability is hit and miss. Despite my disliking GIMP, apart from being free it also has Script-Fu. My original graphics editor was JASC PaintShop Pro and that had scripting (Python) ages ago. This would be huge and would also create a new ecosystem around the software and brand loyalty.Ībsolutely. I suggest (and I'm not the first) that Serif offer an API to programmers to provide scripts and plug-ins to extend the functionality of Publisher (and obviously the other apps). So, I reopen the discussion here and urge Affinity to consider this for the near-term. This is my suggestion and I was hoping v2 would have had this. This is not only a huge opportunity for coders, but also for Serif, too. or as freeware if they desire) extended functionality. So, what I think Serif should do is open up the software to coders to offer (at a cost to the consumer. No company has ALL the resources necessary to address every user's demands and should be expected to. This would be huge and would also create a new ecosystem around the software and brand loyalty. However, Serif doesn't have to develop every feature requested by users!!! I still bought v1 and would have still bought v2 to encourage competition with Adobe, and I realize that Adobe has had many more years to develop their software. That held me back from using Publisher in anything but personal projects because I do a lot of long document publishing. First, I'd like to say that I'm excited to try out the new features in Publisher.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |